Data Engineering Principles

Navin Keswani

Navin Keswani

Retreaded mathematician. Voracious learner.

I’ve recently joined Cogent as a Lead Developer and before that, I worked on Data related systems as a Data Engineer and as an Architect. I’d like to bring some of the knowledge and experience from these domains to the Cogent community and so I thought that cross posting this article (that also appears on my personal blog), would be a good way to start.

Here are a set of principles that guide the design and development of systems responsible for transforming data. They come from my own experience with this general domain but they originated from my experience at Ambiata. I was taught these principles by Russell Aronson, Mark Hibberd and Nick Hibberd, and I am very grateful to them.

Expect data to be poor quality

This is perhaps the most fundamental principle. Expect data to be poorly formed, and work defensively to detect and correct this. If you fail to adopt this principle, you’ll see sporadic failures in data pipelines with diagnoses that point to unexpected data. These are usually accompanied by complaints, fingers pointed at the source of the data, and judgement passed. The code base ends up with churny fixes that patch the system to cope with these point problems – a whack-a-mole approach if you will.

Here are some examples of poor data quality in a data feed that should be expected and accepted:

  • Date-formats that change over time
  • Schemas that change – columns disappear or appear
  • File formats change (dos, unix)
  • The size/amount varies suddenly (possibly indicating errors upstream to the system)

The remainder of the principles are mostly in response to this fundamental principle.

Measure the characteristics of the data

If we expect the data to be poor quality, we should gather more information about itso that we know what is being ingested and whether it should be processed. Here are some characteristics that are relatively straightforward to collect and store as metadata:

  • Size
  • Header
  • Number of columns
  • Number of rows
  • Means, medians, quartiles of numeric data
  • Uniqueness of entries in col x
  • Type inference for column x (what primitive type does the column show up as – String, Int, Double or Bool)

We need steps in the pipeline to act on these measurements. This is usually a stage of the pipeline that has operational responsibility – it typically occurs soon after ingestion/extraction and compares incoming data with measurements from similar events. It raises alerts and/or stops the pipeline from processing data that is deemed suspect.

Normalise and enrich the data

Have a transformation step to normalize the data to formats and schemas that the pipeline expects. The sorts of normalising transformations that fit this step include:

  • Standardising file and character encodings (use command line tools like `file` and `iconv`)
  • Transforming different date and time formats
  • Standardising separators, padding etc. (this also allows for detection of mangled quoting in CSVs for example)

Maintain provenance information

Information about the provenance of data in the system enables the ability to trace or backtrack through transformations. It helps with diagnosing issues but also with definitively being able to answer questions about when and from where, data entered any stage of the pipeline. The next principle follows on quite naturally from this.

Keep the data immutable

At every step in the pipeline, source data should always be available exactly as it was first encountered. This will address:

  • Concerns around processing corrupt or otherwise mangled data
  • Easier and faster debugging or troubleshooting
  • The ability to re-run any component or stage of the pipeline in isolation

This will mean storing multiple copies of data but the copies should have different contexts (typically corresponding to the stages of the pipeline).

Monitor information loss

As data traverses the pipeline it can lose information. This should not be accidental.

Consciously allow this to happen, or not.

Hopefully these principles are thought provoking and help provide some structure. They are not a complete set by any means. I recommend Mark Hibberd’s Lake, Swamp or Puddle: Data Quality for more on the topic.

Liked this post? Share it on…

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Related posts

Anwesha Chatterjee

Remote Pairing – Do’s and Don’ts

Whilst pairing has been a fairly consistent part of my years as a software developer, Cogent was where I first started remote pairing. I’ve found the remote aspect of the experience amplifies certain challenges so in this post, I share some of the lessons I’ve learnt.

Read More
Sam Chalela

Deploying micro frontends with module federation and Next.js

Micro frontends are an architectural pattern that has become a hot topic in recent years for many good reasons. It has helped organisations break complex UI applications into smaller, more manageable pieces, as well as enabling teams to work end-to-end across a well-defined product or business domain whilst maintaining a consistent user experience across the entire app.

Read More